THE 5 DESPERATE ZINDEEQ
MADKHALIS
Bismillah…A MADkhali is a follower of Rabie al Madkhali
- he is 100% behind the king and they cement the throne of the apostate leaders
These people lead astray many unsuspecting Muslims
- and these are people who do not learn about their Tauheed
THEY HAVE 15 TENETS
There are 2 types of Salafis
i. SALAFI JIHADI
- this is a real Muslim because Salaf means someone who follows the pious predecessors
- the first 3 generations, you call for Jihad and Shariah
ii. SAUDI SALAFI
- they believe it is halal to spy for the kuffaar
- they believe in kufr duna kufr
- this is their Aqeedah, this makes you a Zindeeq, who is worst than a kaafir
- you should not be offended if a person calls you a Salafi
- and if the person calls you a Salafi Jihadi, then that is an honour
15 TENETS OF THE MAD MADKHALI
1ST TENET: THEY CLAIM TAUHEED HAAKIMIYYA IS A BIDA'H
- a thing becomes a bida'h when it is not found in the divine text
e.g. if you go to the synagogues of the Shi'ites, they do not do Tarawee
- because they claim Umar started it
- Tarawee is not a bida'h because it was done by the rasul (SAW)
- all Umar did was to organise it, because people used to come and pray individually
Tauheed Haakimiyya is not a bida'h
- it means Allah is the Only Law-Giver
- if it can be found in the text, then it is haraam to call it a bida'h
- they say well they believe in the Tauheed but it is under another Tauheed
EVIDENCE FOR TAUHEED HAAKIMIYYA IN THE DIVINE TEXT
FIRST EVIDENCE: SURAH AL-A’RAF 7:54
…His Command. Surely, His is the Creation and Commandment. Blessed be Allah, the Lord of the 'Alamin (mankind, jinns and all that exists)! (Al- A'raf 7:54)
- unto Allah belongs the creation and commandment
SECOND EVIDENCE: SURAH AL-KAHF 18:26
…He makes none to share in His Decision and His Rule." (Al- Kahf 18:26)
- This is the 2nd ayah to prove Tauheed Haakimiyya is mentioned in the Qur'an
THIRD EVIDENCE: SURAH ASH-SHURA 42:21
Or even do they have associates (with Allah) who have legislated for them as the religion that which Allah has not given permission? And had it not been for the Word of Verdict, indeed it would have been decreed between them, and surely the unjust will have a painful torment. (Ash- Shura 42:21) [Dr Ghalli] (Best Translation)
- Allah is asking a question here
Or have they partners with Allah (false gods), who have instituted for them a religion which Allah has not allowed. And had it not been for a decisive Word (gone forth already), the matter would have been judged between them. And verily, for the Zalimûn (polytheists and wrong- doers), there is a painful torment. (Ash- Shura 42:21) [Muhsin Khan]
What! have they partners (in godhead), who have established for them some religion without the permission of God? Had it not been for the Decree of Judgment, the matter would have been decided between them (at once). But verily the Wrong- doers will have a grievous Penalty. (Ash- Shura 42:21) [Yusuf Ali]
Or have they partners (of Allah) who have made lawful for them in religion that which Allah allowed not? And but for a decisive word (gone forth already), it would have been judged between them. Lo! for wrong- doers is a painful doom. (Ash- Shura 42:21) [Pickthall]
- it would have been more appropriate to say legislate because Allah said SHARA3U
FOURTH EVIDENCE: SURAH AT-TIN 95:8
Is not Allah the Best of judges? (At- Tin 95:8)
FIFTH EVIDENCE: SURAH AL-FATIHAH 1:4
The Only Owner (and the Only Ruling Judge) of the Day of Recompense (i.e. the Day of Resurrection). (Al-Fatihah 1:4)
The claim Tauheed Haakimiyya was not a term used by the Sahabah
- we say to you Hadith Sahih, Mutawaatir, Hassan, Mursal etc were not used by the Sahabah
You have to be careful of relying on translations because you are at the mercy of the translator
e.g. nard (backgammon) is haraam not chess
Buraida reported on the authority of his father that Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) said: He who played chess is like one who dyed his band with the flesh and blood of swine. [Sahih Muslim, Book 28, Hadith #5612] (English Translation by Abdul Hamid Siddiqui) (Incorrect Translation)
CORRECT TRANSLATION:
Buraydah (RA), according to which the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever plays with dice, it is as if he dipped his hand in the flesh and blood of a pig.” [Muslim (2260)]
e.g. Surah Al-Anfal 8:60, Allah says: turhiboona (strike terror)
INCORRECT TRANSLATION
And make ready against them all you can of power, including steeds of war (tanks, planes, missiles, artillery, etc.) to threaten the enemy of Allah and your enemy, and others besides whom, you may not know but whom Allah does know. And whatever you shall spend in the Cause of Allah shall be repaid unto you, and you shall not be treated unjustly. (Al- Anfal 8:60) [Muhsin Khan]
CORRECT TRANSLATION
Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly. (Al- Anfal 8:60) [Yusuf Ali]
- Allah said to strike terror into the hearts into the enemies of Allah.
- Yusuf Ali translation is correct translation, do not lie on Allah when you translate the Quran
- say what Allah Says!
The MADkhalis said they consider the Tauheed haakimiyah as a bid’ah
- as the expression was not found amongst the Sahabah or Tabi'i
- the scholars classify the knowledge in order for you to understand the knowledge properly
- the khawaarij do not classify knowledge: they do not know about major and minor kufr.
- the scholars classify knowledge so that you do not become a deviant.
In Islam we have major and minor classifications for everything.
- i.e. wudu for urination, ghusl for ejaculation
- there are two types of shirk: major and minor.
- two types of discharge: major and minor.
- if you do not know this, you are a headless chicken.
- and for the man there is two types of discharge.
- if you do not know this: you are a deviant in regards to Fiqh and Aqeedah.
- so the scholars classify knowledge for you: so you do not become a deviant
- it is a mercy for you.
- Ibn Taymiyyah: Before he was born, there was no such expression as "tawheed asma was- sifaat"
- but when Ibn Taymiyyah became a scholar he brought about this classification
- this is to ascribe to Allah, His Names and Attributes
- Ibn Taymiyyah introduced it for us and described it for us.
- Question to the MADkhalis:
- Why didn't you scream and shout "bidaah" about this classification by Ibn Taymiyyah?
- like you do about haakiymiyah
2ND TENET: THEY PRACTICE ‘SLIDING AND HIDING’
- Since one of Allah’s 99 Names is al-Hakam [The Judge]
- They say, we will not reject it, but we will slide it under Tawheed Rubbubiyyah!
- claiming they mean the same thing.
- we say to you: your Aqeedah is lethal and atrocious.
- you make the Shaytan a Muslim when you do this.
- when you slide haakimiyyah under Rubbubiyyah.
[Iblis (Satan)] said: "O my Lord! Give me then respite till the Day they (the dead) will be resurrected." (Al- Hijr 15:36)
The Shaytan in this Ayah. declares that Allah is his Only Lord.
- Secondly: the Shaytan declares that there is a day of resurrection.
- and there is life after death.
- the Shaytan declares his belief in Tawheed Rubbubiyyah in 15:36
- Then why is the Shaytan a kaafir? because he rebelled against Allah’s Hakimiyyah
- by refusing to bow down to Adam (AS)
(Allah) said: "What prevented you (O Iblis) that you did not prostrate, when I commanded you?" Iblis said: "I am better than him (Adam), You created me from fire, and him You created from clay." (Al- A'raf 7:12)
- A person who believes in haakimiyyah: says "We hear and we obey"!
- When you slide haakimiyah under Rubbubiyaah, you are guilty of making Shaytan a Muslim.
- Shaytan was the first racist, rationalist and the first to rebel against Allahs haakimiyyah.
Muhammad Ibrahim [the shaikh of bin Baaz] said in page 6 of his book Tahkeem al Qawaneen: "Tawheed haakimiyya is the twin half of tawheed Ibaada."
- you claim that the expression "tawheed haakimiyyah" was not used by the Sahabahs, therefore claiming it is bidah.
- the Shaikh of Bin Baaz (Muhammad Ibrahim) used the word tawheed haakimiyyah in his works.
- this means the man who taught Bin Baaz Islam, was a cursed innovator?!!
- The Madkhalis are Murji with the leaders [Soft and Gentle], khawaarij [Harsh] with the Ummah
- and Jabbriyah with the rulers: claiming its Qadr Allah that the leaders are in power. Not to topple them
- they are raafidite with the Du3at, they slander the Dua3t
SHAIKH WASI- ULLAH ABBAS WARNS AGAINST ABU KHADEEJAH, BILAL DAVIS & OTHERS: Click
- Abu Khadijah is so evil, that the Shaikh’s of Saudi Arabia warned people against him
- recently the MADkhalis have opened the room in paltalk: "Authentic Salafiyyah"
- in this room they preach that you should obey the apostate leaders.
- they are raafidites with the Mujahideen also, slandering their names
- Why did ibn Taymiyyah introduce the category Asma was-Sifat?
- because every era has its fitnah
…So Allah will suffice you against them. And He is the All- Hearer, the All- Knower. (Al- Baqarah 2:137)
- Uthmans blood fell on this ayah, those who killed Uthman were killed by the sword one by one.
- they killed one of the man in Egypt and killed the donkey and stuffed him in the donkey and burned them both!
- in the time of Ahmad ibn Hanbal the fitnah was "khalq al- Quran" [that the Quran was created]
- the Mu’tazlite spread the fitnah
- in the time of ibn Taymiyyah, the fitnah was the Jahmiyyah: those who deny Allah’s Names and Attributes
- so he found it necessary to introduce the new category which was Tawheed Asmaa was- Siffaat.
- when ibn Taymiyyah introduced this new category: Nobody screamed "Bidaah"
- The fitnah of our time is the Shariah of Allah, since the Khilafah was dismantled.
- if you slide the haakimiyyah under the tawheed ibaadah (uluhiyyah) - you have become a deviant
- it is a lie and who can be eviler than the one who lies against Allah?
- to turn to Allah alone for Judgment is like worshiping Allah alone.
While 'Allama al- Shinqiti- May Allah be merciful with him- has said: To commit shirk with Allah in judging is of the same meaning as to commit shirk in His worship, there is no difference between the two in any manner. There is no difference in any sense between he who follows a system (nizam) other than Allah's system or law other than Allah's law (Shariah) and he who worships an idol or prostrates to a false god. They are the same and both are polytheists [associating others] with Allah. (Adwa' al- Bayan, 7:162)
Verily, those who have turned back (have apostated) as disbelievers after the guidance has been manifested to them, Shaitan (Satan) has beautified for them (their false hopes), and (Allah) prolonged their term (age). (Muhammad 47:25)
- think about those who go to the U.N. for judgement
- when you join the U.N. you have become an apostate regime
This is because they said to those who hate what Allah has sent down: "We will obey you in part of the matter," but Allah knows their secrets. (Muhammad 47:26)
- When you join these organisations you become an apostate.
- why? because they hate what Allah has revealed!
- they said to those who hate what Allah has revealed: "we will obey you in part of the matter"
GAZA FLOTILLA RAID: Click
BOSNIA SERBS DRIVE TO TAKE SARAJEVO; U.N. IS KEPT BACK: Click
- where was the U.N when all these massacres took place?
- the only organisation you are allowed to give your signature to: is an Islamic Organisation.
- an organisation that loves what Allah has revealed, not one that hates what Allah has revealed.
- Allah mentioned the four Tawheeds in Surah Al- Fatihah
All the praises and thanks be to Allah, the Lord of the 'Alamin (mankind, jinns and all that exists). (Al- Fatihah 1:2)
The Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful. (Al- Fatihah 1:3)
The Only Owner (and the Only Ruling Judge) of the Day of Recompense (i.e. the Day of Resurrection). (Al- Fatihah 1:4)
You (Alone) we worship, and You (Alone) we ask for help (for each and everything). (Al- Fatihah 1:5)
- Rubbubiyah, Asma was- Siffaat, Tawheed Haakimiyyah, Tawheed Ibaadah (Uluhiyyah)
- when prophet Yusuf was in prison he taught the four Tawheed’s to the inmates in prison.
"O two companions of the prison! Are many different lords (gods) better or Allah, the One, the Irresistible? (Yusuf 12:39)
"You do not worship besides Him but only names which you have named (forged), you and your fathers, for which Allah has sent down no authority. The command (or the judgement) is for none but Allah. He has commanded that you worship none but Him (i.e. His Monotheism), that is the (true) straight religion, but most men know not. (Yusuf 12:40)
- again same order: - Rubbubiyah, Asma was- Siffaat, Tawheed Haakimiyyah, Tawheed Ibaadah (Uluhiyyah)
3RD TENET: THEY REFUSE TO ACCEPT THE IJMAA OF THE UMMAH AND PREACH KUFR DUNA KUFR
- if you are Ahlul Hadeeth: why do you quote weak Hadeeth?
- kufr duna kufr - the scholars reject it, because they cannot be sure who said it.
- 50% say ibn Abbas said it and the other say Tawoos said it.
- why then do you base your religion on a statement which is known to be weak?
- what a hypocrisy
- e.g. if you take a man to court because he accused you of being gay.
- you have 2 witnesses, one said it was Ahmad, the other said it was Zaid.
- the judge is confused, he does not know who to believe
- so he has to throw the case out of court.
- how is this relevant? because the scholars cannot make up their minds who said it
- we cannot rely upon it, we cannot use it as hujjah
- the rasool said:
"...so you must keep to my Sunnah and to the Sunnah of the Khulafa ar-Rashideen (the rightly guided caliphs), those who guide to the right way. Cling to it stubbornly [literally: with your molar teeth]. Beware of newly invented matters [in the religion], for verily every bidah (innovation) is misguidance." [Related by Aboo Daawood (no. 4607) and by at- Tirmidhi (no. 2676)]
An-Nu'man ibn Bashir said, "I heard the Messenger of Allah (SAW), say, 'The halal is clear and the haram is clear. But between the two there are doubtful things about which most people have no knowledge. Whoever exercises caution with regard to what is doubtful, shows prudence in respect of his deen and his honour. Whoever gets involved in the doubtful things is like a herdsman who grazes his animals near a private preserve (hima). He is bound to enter it. Every king has a private preserve and the private preserve of Allah on His earth are the things that He has made forbidden. There is lump of flesh in the body, the nature of which is that when it is sound, the entire body is sound, and when it is corrupt, the entire body is corrupt - it is the heart.'" [Al-Bukhari (2051) and Muslim (1599)]
- some Sahabahs said they found Mughira ibn Shu'ba committing Zina,
- they took the case to Umar, he separated them and they all had different stories!
- Umar told Mughira to go home, there was no case to answer.
The case of Mughirah bin Shu`bah, in which `Umar punished Abu Bakrah and the other two eye-witnesses on the charge of false accusation. A critical study of the entire case shows that this precedent is not applicable to every case where the crime is not proved by proper evidence
The facts of the case are that Mughirah bin Sh u`bah, the Governor of Basrah, did not have good relations with Abu Bakrah, whose house was opposite to his house across the same street. One day the windows of the two houses were opened by a strong current of wind. When 'Abu Bakrah got up to close his window, he saw through the opposite window across the street Mughirah in a state of actual sexual intercourse. He asked three of his friends (Naf`i bin Kaladah, and Shibl bin Ma`bad) who were also sitting with him to stand up and witness w Mughirah was doing. The friends asked him who was the woman. Abu Bakrah. said that she was Umm Jamil. The next day a complaint to this effect was sent to `Umar, who immediately suspended Mughirah and appointed Abu Musa Ash`ari as Governor of Basrah. Mughirah along with the witnesses was called to AI-Madinah. When they were asked about the case, Abu Bakrah said that they had seen Mughirah actually committing sexual intercourse with umm Jamil, but Ziad said that the woman was not clearly visible and that he could not say definitely whether it was Umm Jamil or not. During the cross examination, Mughirah proved that they could not have seen the woman distinctly from the place where they were standing. He also proved that there was a close resemblance between his wife and Umm Jamil. Besides this, circumstantial evidence also showed that during the Caliphate of `Umar, the governor of a province could not have committed this crime in his official residence, especially when his wife was also living with him. Thus the supposition of Abu Bakrah and his companions that Mughirah was having sexual intercourse with Umm Jamil, instead of his own wife, was nothing but a misplaced suspicion. It was for this reason that `Umar not only acquitted the accused but also punished Abu Bakrah, Naf`i and Shibl as slanderers. It is obvious that this isolated decision was based on the specific circumstances of the case and not on the principle that the witnesses must be' punished when they are not able to prove the charge by their evidence. (For details of this case, see Ahkam al-Qur'an, Ibn al-`Arabi, Vol. II, pp. 88, 89).
- You are not allowed to base your Aqeedah on a weak hadith!
- we ask: "when did Ibn Abbas say this?"
- they answer: "he said it during the khilafah of Ali"
- then you have trapped yourself, here comes the knockout punch!
- When Imam Ali was Khalif, he did not dismantle the Shariah!
- therefore, Ibn Abbas was not commenting on the Shariah
- he was commenting on the fitnah between Ali and Muawiyah.
- How could Ali have dismantled the Shariah?!
- they preach to the Muslims, "forget about the Shariah, and think about yourself!"
- that person is an enemy of Muhammad, and this person is a Zindeeq (Heretic)
Ibn Taymiyyah said: And it is known from the religion (of Islam) by necessity and by the consensus of all Muslims that whoever legalizes to follow other than the religion of Islam or a Sharia other than the Sharia of Muhammad (SAW), he is a Kaafir. And his kufr is similar to that of the one who believes in some part of the book (Quran) and reject some of it. [Majmua al- Fataawa, Vol 28, p. 524]
So Whosoever abandons the wise Shariah which was revealed upon Muhammed ibn Abdullah, the seal of the prophets, and goes to other abrogated Shariah for judgment, he becomes a Kaafir. So how about the one who goes to al- Yaasiq (man- made law) for judgment and gives it precedence (over the Sharia of Muhammed (saw). Whosoever does this has become a Kaafir by the Ijma of the Muslims. [Ibn Kathir, Al- Bidayah Wan- Nihayah, Vol 13, p119]
- this fatwa is even more devastating than the fatwa of ibn Taymiyyah.
- ibn Kathir was the student of ibn Taymiyyah, why is it more devastating?
- the MADkhali will say to you:
- If a leader should abandon the Shariah it is not enough, he has to legitimise it with his tongue.
- the MADkhali tries to trick you, they are putting words in the mouth of ibn Kathir!!
- you are seeking to put a spin on the fatawa
- they say you have to do istihlal (to make halal!)
- even when they abandon the Shariah of Muhammad and govern with manmade isms and schisms
Examine the fatwa of ibn Kathir, he did not say you have to wait for the leader to do istihlal
- when you put that as a condition, you are seeking to put words into the mouth of Ibn Kathir
Thus, it has become in his sons a followed law to which they have been giving precedence over ruling by the book of Allah and the Sunnah of His messenger (SAW). Whoever does this is a Kaafir who must be fought until he returns to the rule of Allah and His messenger. So no one other than He should rule neither minorly or majorly". [Tafseer Ibn Kathir, Vol 2, p.67]
- ibn Taymiyya made takfir on the Tatars, those who governed with al Yaasiq
Shaykh al- Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 728H): “Whenever a person makes halal what is haraam by consensus or makes haraam what is halal by consensus or replaces the Sharee’ah that is agreed upon by consensus, then he is a Kaffir by the agreement of the scholars of Fiqh.” [Al- Fataawa, Vol. 3, p.267]
In Saudi Arabia we have al Yaasiq, a cocktail of western style capitalism
- the Saudi- British bank, these are banks based on Riba
- Saudi Hollandi bank ripping people off with riba
"Riba has seventy segments, the least serious being equivalent to a man committing adultery with his own mother." [Ibn Majah, Vol. 3, p337, #2274 and Mustadrak Al- Hakim, Vol. 2, p43, #2259]
- secondly you have racism and Arab nationalism as part of their Shariah there
- a Saudi citizen cannot marry a non Saud, they have made it illegal (haraam)
- Ibn Taymiyyah made takfir on the Tatars and fought them
- we have a new al-Yaasiq today, why didn’t you call Ibn Taymiyyah a Khawaarij?
- these Zanaadiqa claim that the Mujahideen are Khawaarij!
SHAIKH FAWZAAN CLAIMS: TRACKING DOWN THE MUJAHIDEEN IS ONE OF THE GREATEST FORMS OF JIHAD: Click
- nobody brags and boasts like a MADkhali
- they say there is no ijmaah - they try to take away the ijmaah.
- no body brags and boast about following ibn Taymiyyah and ibn Kathir like a Saudi Salafi
- ibn Taymiyyah put all his knowledge in the book into 37 volumes!
- they translate and spread the books
- look at their hypocrisy
- when ibn Taymiyyah and ibn Kathir gave the ijmaah
- that to dismantle the Shariah makes one a kaafir, they refuse to accept this ijmaah
- we say to the MADkhali:
- if it was a minor kufr to dismantle the Shariah, why did Allah turn the Jews into apes and swine?
Say (O Muhammad SAW to the people of the Scripture): "Shall I inform you of something worse than that, regarding the recompense from Allah: those (Jews) who incurred the Curse of Allah and His Wrath, those of whom (some) He transformed into monkeys and swines, those who worshipped Taghut (false deities); such are worse in rank (on the Day of Resurrection in the Hellfire), and far more astray from the Right Path (in the life of this world)." (Al-Ma'idah 5:60)
- you are claiming Allah was over reacting?!
- always remember to quote this verse, when refuting their argument of ‘kufr duna kufr’
4TH TENET: THEY REFUSE TO REJECT THE TAGHOOT
- they are in bed with the Taghoot and they spy for the Taghoot!
- Abdul Haqq Baker said he was spying on the Muslims for 5 years!!
Click for video
- a Salafi Jihadi is a real Muslim, he believes in Shariah, Jihad and Khilafah
- the Saudi Salafi is a munafiq
- the kufr of a shia is blatant
- the kufr of the Saudi Salafi is more subtle and can be more dangerous to the youth of the Ummah.
No comments:
Post a Comment